The affordable middle class of smartphones is populated and well populated. The telephones framed in this segment are diverse It’s easy to get lost among so many options.
All companies have phones for a price range below 200 euros They are complete and have compliant properties. Does that mean they are for everyone? Definitely not. As with everything in life, it always depends on the specifics, needs and pockets of each individual. However, if your spending range is a maximum of 200 euros, you will be interested in this comparison.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9C and the Samsung Galaxy A21 are two smartphones that try to take advantage of the price-performance ratio. They are not ostentatious in their price or in their materials, But both Xiaomi and Samsung have tried to tighten their belts democratize the price as much as possible both proposals.
If you’re hesitant to go for a more basic terminal, or to stretch a little, we’ll give you all the information you need so that the decision doesn’t cause a headache. So, let’s go to the chaos, Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs Samsung A21s: which one to choose and why?
Design and display: two really similar options
With the Xiaomi 9C We found a large smartphone with dimensions 164.9 x 77.1 x 9 mm and a weight of 196 grams. On the front is a 6.5-inch HD + LCD panel (1,600 x 720 pixels) with a density of 269 ppi and an aspect ratio of 20: 9. In its central part is a teardrop-shaped notch for the front camera.
The Xiaomi 9C is available in black, blue and orange, and the Chinese company has decided plastic for its manufacture.
For his part, Samsung A21s has slightly smaller dimensions, 163.7 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm and a similar weight, 192 g. The screen practically repeats functions: 6.5-inch LCD panel with HD + resolution of 1,600 x 720 px, 270 ppi density and 20: 9 aspect ratio. It looks like copy and paste, but it is. The difference lies in the position of the selfie camera as it is in the upper left part in a “hole”.
This Samsung smartphone is available in three colors: black, white and blue, and is its predominant material Plastic.
So who wins in terms of screen and design? With the data available, we can say nothing else than technical tie.
Cameras: The price difference destabilizes this area
When we get to the camera area, we see the first differences between the two terminals. In the case of the Xiaomi Redmi 9C, it equips a triple rear view camera with a 48 MP main sensor, a 2 MP macro lens and a 2MP depth sensor. But contains LED flash though It has neither stabilizer nor slow motion video. The Chinese company decided on a 5 MP lens for the selfie camera. As we can see in the calculation, it is a fairly discreet camera configuration, but according to the price it is around 130 euros. Little more can be asked there.
On the contrary, the Samsung Galaxy A21s makes the price difference here. This terminal offers a configuration of Quad rear view camera, with a 48MP primary lens, an 8MP wide angle lens, a 2MP macro lens, and a 2MP depth lens. For the The front of this terminal from the Korean company has a 13 MP camera. But like with the Xiaomi there is no optical stabilizer or no slow motion. It is equipped with an LED flash.
Battery and Performance: No runtime complaints
If we move on to the battery sector, we have almost characteristic properties again. He Xiaomi Redmi 9C is equipped with a 5,000 mAh Li-ion battery. supported by a 10 W fast charge. This is not removable and under normal conditions of use it pays off for more than a day.
If we go to the Samsung Galaxy A21 we find a Li-Polymer battery, also 5,000 mAh, but in this case the quick charge increases the stake to 15 W. It is also not removable and, as is the case with its rival in this comparison, it should be more than enough at the end of the day and the next day.
Processor and memory: Samsung offers more choices
Let’s get to the basics, the processor and the various components that make it glow or not. In the Xiaomi Redmi 9C, it equips the chip Mediatek Helio G35 2.3 GHz eight-core (8 Cortex A53 2.3 GHz). It is accompanied by a discrete configuration of 2 or 3 GB RAM and 32 or 64 GB ROM expandable with microSD card. When going through the processor through AnTuTu’s clutches, 110,490 points were achieved.
The South Korean company selected the processor for the Samsung smartphone that is concentrating us here 8-core Exynos 850 with 2 GHz (4 Cortex A55 2.0 GHz + 4 Cortex A55 2.0 GHz). There are also three options RAM memory (3, 4 or 6 GB) and 32 or 64 GB ROM, expandable via microSD card. In the version with 3 GB + 32 GB, the Samsung smartphone achieved 117,341 points.
Connectivity: no 5G in sight
If we’re talking about an input or middle input area here, it won’t surprise anyone Neither of these two devices has 5G connectivity. If we look at the processors they equip, we should have guessed that this is the case.
Apart from 5G, we find the in the Xiaomi Redmi 9C Bluetooth version 5.0, GPS, 3.5-way headphone input, FM radio and fingerprint sensor on the back. On this occasion, and not as with many devices in low Xiaomi areas, the Chinese company decided equip this smartphone with NFC.
What does the Samsung Galaxy A21 offer in this area? Well, practically a copy. Has 3.5x headphone input, FM radio, Bluetooth 5.0, Dual SIM, GPS and… NFC, yes. The fingerprint sensor is also located on the back.
Xiaomi Redmi 9C vs Samsung A21s: which one should I buy?
As you have seen, the point is to read point by point two very even smartphones who try to offer as much as possible in their own way by adjusting their price. Obviously we are talking about two different business models. On the one hand, we have a young company like Xiaomi, which always has an enviable price-performance ratio and is trying to strongly democratize the technology.
On the other end, we have Samsung, a proven and global leader trying to cater to all areas of the market Any case that wants to go for a Samsung can do it.
What can we do with all of this? Face to face and without considering the price, the choice would be clear: Samsung Galaxy A21s. The problem? What For 180-200 euros there are certainly other better options on the market outside of Samsung. Of course, if you want a terminal from the Korean company, it’s a great mid-entry option, especially if we manage to get an offer that brings the price down under 180-190 euros with the high settings of 4 + 64 GB. There would be a clear winner.
However, if we want to spend as little as possible and have access to the benefits that a smartphone offers, we believe that the Xiaomi Redmi 9C is a better buy, It’s easy to find on sale for 130 euros or less.
Of course, it is better to buy when you know what you are buying as well be aware of its limitations and advantages. Xiaomi puts itself in front of each other and simply asks whether the price difference between the two is really justified, even though the guarantee from a brand like Samsung doesn’t offer it.